Operable windows, personal control and occupant comfort.

TLDR

Past research showed that occupants of naturally ventilated buildings are comfortable across a broader temperature range than those in centrally controlled HVAC systems, yet the specific impact of personal window control remained unclear due to limited field data. This study aimed to quantitatively assess how personal control of operable windows in office settings affects local thermal conditions and occupant comfort. Researchers conducted a field study in a naturally ventilated office building, continuously measuring each workstation’s microclimate and administering a web-based survey multiple times daily, linking over 1,000 responses per season to concurrent physical assessments. Results revealed that occupants with varying degrees of window control exhibited significantly different thermal responses despite identical environmental, clothing, and activity conditions, reinforcing the adaptive model’s emphasis on shifting expectations.

Abstract

Past research (ASHRAE RP-884) demonstrated that occupants of naturally ventilated buildings are comfortable in a wider range of temperatures than occupants of buildings with centrally controlled HVAC systems. However, the exact influence of personal control in explaining these differences could only be hypothesized because of the limits of the existing field study data that formed the basis of that research. The objective of ASHRAE RP-1161 was to quantitatively investigate how personal control of operable windows in office settings influences local thermal conditions and occupant comfort. We conducted a field study in a naturally ventilated building where occupants had varying degrees of control over the windows. Utilizing continuous measurement of each subject’s workstation microclimate, plus a Web-based survey that subjects took several times a day and was cross-linked to concurrent physical assessments of workstation microclimatic conditions, we collected over 1000 survey responses in each of the two main seasons. The data show that occupants with different degrees of personal control had significantly diverse thermal responses, even when they experienced the same thermal environments and clothing and activity levels. Our findings offer further empirical support for the role of shifting expectations in the adaptive model of thermal comfort.