Notes and Records the Royal Society Journal of the History of Science · 2015 · 61 citations · 19 references
HumanitiesCommunicationNature Of SciencePhilosophy Of ScienceScience CommunicationEditorial HistoryPeer ReviewScholarly EditingScience JournalismEditorial CollaborationExternal Review ProcessesHistory Of Scientific JournalsPeer Review In Journalism
This paper examines the refereeing procedures at the scientific weekly Nature during and after World War II. In 1939 former editorial assistants L. J. F. Brimble and A. J. V. Gale assumed a joint editorship of Nature. The Brimble-Gale era is now most famous for the editors' unsystematic approach to external refereeing. Although Brimble and Gale did sometimes consult external referees, papers submitted or recommended by scientists whom the pair trusted were often not sent out for further review. Their successor, John Maddox, would also print papers he admired without external refereeing. It was not until 1973 that editor David Davies made external peer review a requirement for publication in Nature. Nature's example shows that as late as the 1960s a journal could be considered scientifically respectable even if its editors were known to eschew systematic external peer review.
19
Molecular Configuration in Sodium Thymonucleate
Rosalind Franklin, R.G. Gosling · Nature · 1953 · 1.3K citations
Continent and Ocean Basin Evolution by Spreading of the Sea Floor
Robert S. Dietz · Nature · 1961 · 651 citations
Human basophil degranulation triggered by very dilute antiserum against IgE
E. Davenas, Francis Beauvais, John P. Amara et al. · Nature · 1988 · 602 citations
What mad pursuit: a personal view of scientific discovery
Choice Reviews Online · 1989 · 392 citations