Tropical Conservation Science · 2014 · 33 citations · 50 references
Life SciencesEcologyZoologyConservation ZoologyPopulation EcologyWildlife BiologyWildlife CaptureWildlife ConservationCapture-recapture EstimationCapture-recapture ModelsPopulation Parameter EstimationRecapture ModelingSpatially Explicit Capture-recaptureThreatened Species
Estimates of population density are essential for the effective conservation and management of any threatened species. Accurately estimating density of elusive carnivores can be a challenge, however. One approach to this challenge is integration of DNA collected noninvasively from feces with capture-recapture modeling. To date, the bias and precision of this technique have seldom been evaluated in the field. We compared density estimates of ocelots ( Leopardus pardalis) derived from fecal noninvasive genetic techniques to density estimates from camera trapping in the same population, during the same study period. Density estimates from the two techniques were comparable, especially when using spatially explicit capture-recapture models. Population density estimated using the program DENSITY was 1.74/km 2 (SE = 0.584) from noninvasive genetics and 1.59/km 2 (SE = 0.464) from camera trapping. These estimates also represent the highest reported ocelot population density within the species range.
50
Program MARK: survival estimation from populations of marked animals
Gary C. White, Kenneth P. Burnham · Bird Study · 1999 · 7.6K citations
Statistical inference from capture data on closed animal populations
David L. Otis, Kenneth P. Burnham, Gary C. White et al. · 1978 · 2.5K citations
Effects of Sample Size on Kernel Home Range Estimates
D. E. Seaman, Joshua J. Millspaugh, Brian J. Kernohan et al. · Journal of Wildlife Management · 1999 · 1.4K citations
Computing, Biostatistics, Ecology +12