European Spine Journal · 2015 · 34 citations · 15 references
MedicineOncologySurgerySpine SurgerySurgical OncologySurvival AnalysisCancer Survival AnalysisPreoperative AssessmentPreoperative EvaluationPrognostic AssessmentSpinal Cord CompressionSurvival OutcomesAmbulatory StatusFunctional Outcome EvaluationFunctional Outcome MeasurementOutcomes After Spinal DecompressionPosterior Fossa DecompressionPreoperative Functional AssessmentPrognostic Score ValidationVisceral Metastases
PURPOSE: This study aims to create and validate a score for survival and functional outcome of lung cancer patients with metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC) after posterior decompressive surgery. METHODS: The entire cohort of 73 consecutive patients was randomly assigned to a test group (N = 37) and a validation group (N = 36). In the test group, we retrospectively analyzed 10 preoperative characteristics. Characteristics significantly associated with survival on multivariate analysis were included in the score. Patients in the validation group were used to confirm whether the score was reproducible. Postoperative functional outcome was analyzed both in the test and validation groups. RESULTS: On multivariate analysis, preoperative ambulatory status (P = 0.0017), visceral metastases (P = 0.0002), and time developing motor deficits (P = 0.0004) had significant impact on survival and were included in the scoring system. According to the prognostic scores, which ranged from 0 to 6 points, two risk groups were designed: 0-2 and 3-6 points and the median survival was 2.6 months (95 % CI, 1.0-3.8 months) and 10.7 months (95 % CI, 7.1-13.7 months), respectively (P < 0.0001). In the validation group, the corresponding median survival was 2.7 months (95 % CI, 1.6-5.5 months) and 10.8 months (5.8-13.6 months), respectively (P < 0.0001). In addition, the functional outcome was worse in patients with 0-2 points than in patients with 3-6 points both in the test (P = 0.0023) and validation groups (P = 0.0298). CONCLUSION: Patients with scores of 0-2 points, who have short survival time (life expectancy less than 3 months) and poor functional outcome, appear best treated with radiotherapy or best supportive care alone. Surgery may be no longer in consideration in most of the patients in this group. Patients with score of 3-6 points should be surgical candidates, because survival prognosis (life expectancy more than 10 months) and functional outcome are favorable after surgery.
15
A Revised Scoring System for Preoperative Evaluation of Metastatic Spine Tumor Prognosis
Yasuaki Tokuhashi, Hiromi Matsuzaki, Hiroshi Oda et al. · Spine · 2005 · 1.2K citations
Scoring System for the Preoperative Evaluation of Metastatic Spine Tumor Prognosis
Yasuaki Tokuhashi, Hiromi Matsuzaki, SADAYOSHI TORIYAMA et al. · Spine · 1990 · 711 citations
Spinal metastases from solid tumors. Analysis of factors affecting survival
Panayiotis J. Sioutos, Ehud Arbit, Carrie F. Meshulam et al. · Cancer · 1995 · 219 citations