Validation of doubly labeled water method using a ruminant

Abstract

CO2 production (CDP, ml CO2 . g-1 . h-1) by captive caribou and reindeer (Rangifer tarandus) was measured using the doubly labeled water method (3H2O and H2(18)O) and compared with CO2 expiration rates (VCO2), adjusted for CO2 losses in CH4 and urine, as determined by open-circuit respirometry. CDP calculated from samples of blood or urine from a reindeer in winter was 1-3% higher than the adjusted VCO2. Differences between values derived by the two methods of 5-20% were found in summer trials with caribou. None of these differences were statistically significant (P greater than 0.05). Differences in summer could in part be explained by the net deposition of 3H, 18O, and unlabeled CO2 in antlers and other growing tissues. Total body water volumes calculated from 3H2O dilution were up to 15% higher than those calculated from H2(18)O dilution. The doubly labeled water method appears to be a reasonably accurate method for measuring CDP by caribou and reindeer in winter when growth rates are low, but the method may overestimate CDP by rapidly growing and/or fattening animals.