Publication | Open Access
Underground cables versus overhead lines: Do cables increase social acceptance of grid development? Results of a Contingent Valuation survey in Germany
24
Citations
6
References
2013
Year
Overhead LinesNatural Resource ValuationTransmission Line DevelopmentEconomic InstrumentEnvironmental PlanningPolicy AnalysisSocial SciencesContingent Valuation SurveyInfrastructure InvestmentBuilt EnvironmentUndergroundingExperimental EconomicsEconomic AnalysisEconomicsPublic PolicySocial ImpactUnderground CablesContingent Valuation StudyInfrastructure DevelopmentBusinessNonmarket ValuationGrid Development
Transmission network development plans have led to protests throughout Germany. Many studies present underground cables as a means to increase public agreement to transmission line construction. This paper investigates this thesis reporting results of a Contingent Valuation study conducted in late 2012 in four regions of Germany, which are affected by transmission line development in different ways. In an analysis of 1.003 household responses a majority of households favours underground cables (about 60%). Willingness-to-pay, however, relativizes this result. Almost 50% of households voting for underground cables are not willing to accept an increase in electricity prices to finance cable projects (free riders). The fact that positive willingness-to-pay does not correlate positively with increasing lengths of underground cables in 60% of cases underlines that cables are not supported unconditionally. All-in-all, the thesis that cables increase acceptance of grid development has to be rejected based on the WTP-evaluation presented in this paper.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1