Publication | Open Access
A comparison of three oral electrolyte solutions in the treatment of diarrheic calves.
47
Citations
22
References
1990
Year
Oral Electrolyte TreatmentsVeterinary ResearchEducationRecovery RateLivestock HealthOral Electrolyte SolutionsElectrolyte DisturbanceAnimal ProductionAnimal PhysiologyMilk DigestionAnimal NutritionAnimal Health EconomicsVirologyAnimal SciencePathogenesisPhysiologyVeterinary ScienceAnimal HealthMedicineDiarrheic Calves
Thirty-six diarrheic calves infected with rota- and coronaviruses were randomly allocated to one of three oral electrolyte treatments: Ion-Aid (Syntex Agribusiness), Life-Guard (Norden Inc), or Revibe (Langford Inc). The calves were also allowed voluntary access to milk which was offered at the rate of 5% of body weight per feeding in two feedings daily. There were significant differences in recovery rate among calves treated with the different electrolytes. Only 33% of Ion-Aid-treated calves recovered; Revibe- and Life-Guard-treated calves had high recovery rates of 92% and 83%, respectively. The much higher recovery rates with Life-Guard and Revibe were attributed to the presence of an alkalizing agent in these preparations. Life-Guard uses bicarbonate to counteract acidosis and there was some evidence that this may have interfered with milk digestion. Revibe uses acetate; this was effectively metabolized within the calves' tissues and produced alkalization without interference with milk digestion.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1