PubMed · 1997 · 153 citations · 26 references
MedicineBiochemistryOncologyEndocrine OncologyOncologic Nuclear MedicineTumor PathologyCancer MetabolismCellular UptakePancreatic CancerPancreatic DiseasesTumor ImagingTumor MarkersGlucose TransportHistopathology Of Pancreatic TumorsImmunohistochemical BiomarkersImmunohistochemical DetectionImmunohistochemical MarkersImmunohistochemical StainingTumor Uptake MechanismsTumor-associated Glycoproteins
UNLABELLED: Although overexpression of GLUT-1 glucose transporter has already been reported in human cancers, the mechanism of glucose entry into pancreatic cancers remains unknown. To evaluate the relationship between GLUT glucose transporters and FDG uptake, FDG-PET was performed in 34 preoperative patients (mean age, 60.9 yr) with suspected pancreatic tumors, including 28 malignant and 6 benign tumors. METHODS: FDG uptake at 50 min after injection of 185 MBq of [18F]FDG with >5 hr of fasting was semiquantitatively analyzed as standardized uptake values (SUVs). The GLUT expression was studied by immunohistochemistry of paraffin sections from these tumors after operation using anti-GLUT-1, -2, -3, -4 and -5 antibodies to obtain immunohistochemical grading ("strong," "weak" and "negative") by three experienced physicians. RESULTS: Of 26 malignant tumors proved by histological examination, 23 (88%) tumors were positive for the expression of GLUT-1 glucose transporter, and 17 (61%) showed strong expression. On the other hand, 13 (46%), 0 (0%), 9 (36%) and 13 (46%) malignant tumors were positive for the expression of GLUT-2, -3, -4 and -5 glucose transporters, respectively. Three of six benign tumors showed strong GLUT-1 expression. Concerning GLUT-2, -3, -4 and -5, only one benign tumor showed positive GLUT-5 expression. Thus, GLUT-1 showed relatively high sensitivity but low specificity (50%) for detecting malignant tumors, whereas GLUT-2, -3, -4 and -5 had lower sensitivities but higher specificities. Correlations between SUVs and grading of GLUT immunoreactivity were significant in GLUT-1 (strong, 4.49 +/- 2.95; weak, 3.42 +/- 1.21; negative, 2.52 +/- 0.84) (p < 0.05) but not in the remaining four GLUT transporters. CONCLUSION: These data indicate that GLUT-1 has a significant role in the malignant glucose metabolism and may contribute to the increased uptake of FDG in PET imaging in patients with pancreatic tumor.
26
TNM Classification of Malignant Tumors
Darryl Carter · The American Journal of Surgical Pathology · 1998 · 6.4K citations
Sequence and Structure of a Human Glucose Transporter
Mike Mueckler, Carla Caruso, Stephen A. Baldwin et al. · Science · 1985 · 1.6K citations
OTTO WARBURN, F. Dickens · The American Journal of the Medical Sciences · 1931 · 814 citations