Equivalence of positive Hausdorff measure and the open set condition for self-conformal sets

Abstract

A compact set <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="upper K"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mi>K</mml:mi> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">K</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> is <italic>self-conformal</italic> if it is a finite union of its images by conformal contractions. It is well known that if the conformal contractions satisfy the “open set condition” (OSC), then <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="upper K"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mi>K</mml:mi> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">K</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> has positive <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="s"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mi>s</mml:mi> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">s</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula>-dimensional Hausdorff measure, where <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="s"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mi>s</mml:mi> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">s</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> is the solution of Bowen’s pressure equation. We prove that the OSC, the strong OSC, and positivity of the <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="s"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mi>s</mml:mi> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">s</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula>-dimensional Hausdorff measure are equivalent for conformal contractions; this answers a question of R. D. Mauldin. In the self-similar case, when the contractions are linear, this equivalence was proved by Schief (1994), who used a result of Bandt and Graf (1992), but the proofs in these papers do not extend to the nonlinear setting.