Publication | Closed Access
Negative Emotions Felt During Trial: the Effect of Fear, Anger, and Sadness on Juror Decision Making
45
Citations
37
References
2015
Year
Forensic PsychologySocial PsychologyAffective NeuroscienceLawCapital Murder TrialCriminal LawSocial SciencesPsychologyEmotional ResponseCriminal Justice ProcessEmotion RegulationIntuitive Prosecutor ModelAffect PerceptionNegative Emotions FeltBehavioral SciencesCognitive Appraisal TheoryPunishmentMoral PsychologyCriminal JusticeJuror Decision MakingJusticeEmotionCriminal BehaviorProcedural Justice
Summary During trial, jurors may experience a variety of emotions, many of which are negative. The current study examined the effects the negative emotions anger, fear, and sadness had on jurors' sentencing decisions and explored whether the cognitive appraisal theory or the intuitive prosecutor model could explain these effects. Jurors viewed the sentencing phase of a capital murder trial and were asked to sentence the defendant. Results indicated that after viewing the trial, jurors reported increased anger and sadness, but not fear. However, only change in anger affected jurors' sentences. Jurors who reported a greater change in anger were more likely to sentence the defendant to death. This effect was mediated by the level of importance that jurors placed on the prosecution's evidence and argument. Consistent with the intuitive prosecutor model, increased anger led to higher ratings of the importance of the aggravating evidence and an increase in death sentences. Implications are discussed. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1