British journal of surgery · 2014 · 127 citations · 25 references
MedicineOncologySurgeryOncologic SurgeryOutcomes ResearchSurgical OncologyColorectal CancerPain OutcomesPatient-reported Outcome MeasuresPatient-reported OutcomesPelvic Tumor SurgeryPrognostic AssessmentCancer Pain MeasurementFunctional Outcomes After Pelvic Tumor SurgeryFunctional Outcomes After Urologic Cancer SurgeryHospital Discharge AssessmentMental Health Status AssessmentPatient-reported Outcome ReportingPsychological Symptom DistressQuality Of Life Endpoints
BACKGROUND: Pelvic exenteration is highly radical surgery offering the only potential cure for locally advanced pelvic cancer. This study compared quality of life and other relevant patient-reported outcomes over 12 months for patients who did and those who did not undergo pelvic exenteration. METHODS: Consecutive patients referred for consideration of pelvic exenteration completed clinical and patient-reported outcome assessments at baseline, hospital discharge (exenteration patients only), and 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months. Outcomes included cancer-specific quality of life (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Colorectal; FACT-C), physical and mental health status (Short Form 36 version 2), psychological distress (Distress Thermometer), and pain (study-specific composite) scores. Linear mixed modelling compared trajectories between exenteration and no-exenteration groups. RESULTS: Among 182 patients, 148 (81.3 per cent) proceeded to exenteration. There were no baseline differences between the two groups. Among patients who had exenteration, the mean FACT-C score at baseline of 93.0 had reduced by 14·4 points at hospital discharge, but increased to 86·7 at 1 month after surgery and continued to improve, returning to baseline by 9 months. For patients in the no-exenteration group, FACT-C scores decreased between baseline and 1 month, increased slowly to 6 months and then began to decline at 9 months. There were few statistically or clinically significant differences in any patient-reported outcomes between the groups. CONCLUSION: Quality of life and related patient-reported outcomes improve rapidly after pelvic exenteration surgery. For 9 months after surgery, these outcomes are comparable with those of similar do patients who do not have surgery; thereafter, there is a decline in patients who do not have exenteration. Pelvic exenteration can be performed with acceptable quality of life and patient-reported outcomes.
25
A sharper Bonferroni procedure for multiple tests of significance
Yosef Hochberg · Biometrika · 1988 · 4.7K citations
Rapid screening for psychologic distress in men with prostate carcinoma
Andrew Roth, Alice B. Kornblith, Laure Batel-Copel et al. · Cancer · 1998 · 1.1K citations · Full text
Nursing, Oncology, Psychology +17
User’s manual for the SF-12v2 health survey
JE Ware, Michal Kosinski, Dawn Bowker et al. · 2002 · 1.1K citations
Leonard L. Gunderson, Henry Sosin · Cancer · 1974 · 755 citations · Full text