Composite Resection Reconstruction: Split‐Thickness Skin Graft—A Preferred Option

Abstract

In dealing with reconstruction of the oral cavity postcomposite resection, many options are available. Maximization of function with minimization of complications, physiologic sequelae, and cost must be considered. Fifty consecutive patients who underwent composite resections and were reconstructed by split-thickness skin grafts were analyzed. Factors examined included: number of blood units transfused, disease status vs. stage, length of hospital stay, complications, use of prosthetic devices for aiding in swallowing and speech production, and patient diet at discharge. This evaluation and literature review revealed that the amount of tissue resection was considered to be the most significant functional determinant, followed by maintenance of residual tissue mobility. The use of a split-thickness skin graft was believed to give excellent results for the previously mentioned parameters and is our preferred method for reconstruction of composite resection defects that do not require tissue bulk as in anterior mandible defects, anticipated mandible reconstruction, total or near-total glossectomy, or very massive defects.