Psychoacoustics and its Benefit for the Soundscape Approach

Klaus Genuit, André Fiebig

2006 · 81 citations · 3 references

Concepts

TL;DR

Environmental noise complaints are rising, yet research still relies mainly on averaged sound pressure levels, ignoring key acoustic properties that link annoyance to frequency, duration, impulsive, tonal, and low‑frequency components and to human cognitive processing beyond intensity. The study aims to enhance environmental noise description and evaluation by incorporating hearing‑related parameters, extending existing measurement tools such as variable‑integration level meters and third‑octave analyzers, and applying psychoacoustics to better capture soundscape qualities. The authors extended current measurement tools by employing level meters with variable integration times and third‑octave analyzers to identify disturbing acoustic patterns. The results show that these acoustic properties significantly affect quality of life and that psychoacoustic methods improve the capture of soundscape qualities.

Abstract

Summary The increase of complaints about environmental noise shows the unchanged necessity of researching this subject. By only relying on sound pressure levels averaged over long time periods and by suppressing all aspects of quality, the specific acoustic properties of environmental noise situations cannot be identified. Because annoyance caused by environmental noise has a broader linkage with various acoustical properties such as frequency spectrum, duration, impulsive, tonal and low-frequency components, etc. than only with SPL [1]. In many cases these acoustical properties a ect the quality of life. The human cognitive signal processing pays attention to further factors than only to the averaged intensity of the acoustical stimulus. Therefore, it appears inevitable to use further hearing-related parameters to improve the description and evaluation of environmental noise. A first step regarding the adequate description of environmental noise would be the extended application of existing measurement tools, as for example level meter with variable integration time and third octave analyzer, which o er valuable clues to disturbing patterns. Moreover, the use of psychoacoustics will allow the improved capturing of soundscape qualities.

References

3