Publication | Open Access
Datafication, dataism and dataveillance: Big Data between scientific paradigm and ideology
2K
Citations
22
References
2014
Year
Comfort ZoneEngineeringData TrustPublic OpinionData InfrastructureCommunicationData EcosystemJournalismBig Data InfrastructureSocial MediaData ScienceData IntegrationPolitical CommunicationScientific ParadigmData GovernanceData ManagementMedia InstitutionsRegular CurrencyData PrivacyTrustDigital MediaInformation ManagementResponsible Data ManagementMedia PoliciesData PracticeData SovereigntyMass CommunicationArtsLaw EnforcementData LiteracyPolitical ScienceBig Data
Datafication treats personal data as a commodity, embedding a trust‑based ideology—dataism—into everyday communication, security, and public institutions, thereby shaping a pervasive belief system that warrants critical scrutiny. The article aims to deconstruct the ideological foundations of datafication.
Metadata and data have become a regular currency for citizens to pay for their communication services and security—a trade-off that has nestled into the comfort zone of most people. This article deconstructs the ideological grounds of datafication. Datafication is rooted in problematic ontological and epistemological claims. As part of a larger social media logic, it shows characteristics of a widespread secular belief. Dataism, as this conviction is called, is so successful because masses of people — naively or unwittingly — trust their personal information to corporate platforms. The notion of trust becomes more problematic because people’s faith is extended to other public institutions (e.g. academic research and law enforcement) that handle their (meta)data. The interlocking of government, business, and academia in the adaptation of this ideology makes us want to look more critically at the entire ecosystem of connective media.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1