Meta-research: Evaluation and Improvement of Research Methods and Practices

John P. A. Ioannidis, Daniele Fanelli, Debbie Drake Dunne, Steven N. Goodman

PLoS Biology · 2015 · 494 citations · 10 references

DOIFull text

Open access

Concepts

TL;DR

The expanding scientific enterprise demands empirical evidence to improve research efficiency and reliability, yet existing meta‑research on methods, reporting, reproducibility, evaluation, and incentives remains fragmented. This study defines meta‑research as a discipline that evaluates and improves research practices and presents a map of current efforts with plans to integrate them worldwide. The authors map existing meta‑research initiatives and outline strategies to link these efforts across scientific fields.

Abstract

As the scientific enterprise has grown in size and diversity, we need empirical evidence on the research process to test and apply interventions that make it more efficient and its results more reliable. Meta-research is an evolving scientific discipline that aims to evaluate and improve research practices. It includes thematic areas of methods, reporting, reproducibility, evaluation, and incentives (how to do, report, verify, correct, and reward science). Much work is already done in this growing field, but efforts to-date are fragmented. We provide a map of ongoing efforts and discuss plans for connecting the multiple meta-research efforts across science worldwide.

References

10