Delayed impact: ISI's citation tracking choices are keeping scientists in the dark

Matthew Cockerill

BMC Bioinformatics · 2004 · 12 citations · 0 references

DOIFull text

Open access

Concepts

Abstract

Impact factors – love them or loathe them, as a publisher it is difficult to ignore them. The number one question that BioMed Central gets asked by potential authors is What is the impact factor of the journal XXXXXX?. The scientific community has come to regard impact factors, calculated by the Institute for Scientific Information (ISI), as providing a quantitative and largely objective guide to which journals publish the best research. Although many problems can result from naive reliance on journal impact factors as a quality metric (especially when attempting to compare different fields) [1], the perception of many scientists is that, to get recognition and career advancement, they must publish in a journal with a good impact factor.