Annals of Surgery · 2005 · 225 citations · 20 references
MedicineOncologySurgeryGastrointestinal OncologyHepatologySurgical OncologyBiliary Tract CancerBiliary Tract DiseaseCancer Survival AnalysisHepatobiliary DiseaseHepatobiliary SurgeryLiver CancerBile Duct Cancer SurgeryBile Duct SurgeryPrognostic Factors AnalysisSurvival Rates
In Brief Objectives: The objectives of this study were to analyze the actual long-term outcome after the surgical resection of extrahepatic bile duct cancer and to identify the characteristics shared by long-term survivors (5 years or longer). Summary Background Data: Although reported 5-year survival rates of extrahepatic bile duct cancer lie between 20% and 30%, these data are not reflecting the actual cure rate. Some patients survive longer than 5 years with recurrent disease. In some patients, recurrence is detected after 5 years. Accordingly, true cure rate is probably substantially lower than the 5-year survival rate. Methods: One hundred fifty-one patients from a total of 282 patients with extrahepatic bile duct cancer (excluding ampulla of Vater cancer) underwent surgical resection between 1986 and 1997. We analyzed the actual survival outcome and postresection prognostic factors after resection, which included hepatobiliary resection (HBR; extended either right or left hepatectomy, caudate lobectomy, and hilar bile duct resection, n = 23), bile duct resection (BDR; n = 25), and pancreatoduodenectomy (PD; n = 103). We also compared the clinicopathologic characteristics of actual long-term survivors (n = 49) with those who survived longer than 5 years and with short-term (<5 years) survivors. Results: Forty-nine of the 151 resection cases (32.5%) survived 5 years or longer; there was no 5-year survivor in the nonresected cases. The actual 5-year survival rate was 47.8% after HBR (11 of 23), 28.0% after BDR (7 of 25), and 30.1% after PD (31 of 103) (P = 0.083). Tumor histology and lymph node metastasis were identified as independent prognostic factors by multivariate analysis. Some long-term survivors had poor postoperative prognostic factors such as T3, lymph node metastasis, or microscopic margin involvement, but none with a poorly differentiated tumor. Seven long-term survivors had recurrent disease at 5 years, and recurrence was detected after 5 years in 8 more patients. Therefore, the actual cure rate (<19.2%) was substantially less than the 5-year survival rate. Conclusions: In cases of extrahepatic bile duct cancer, resection should be considered and efforts should be made to obtain a tumor-free margin. An aggressive surgical approach will give some survival benefit to the patients with even advanced disease. Long-term follow up is needed before declaring “a cure,” because late recurrence after 5 years is detected not infrequently. Adjuvant therapy, local and systemic, needs to be further developed. The authors present the experiences of a single institution on the topic of extrahepatic bile duct cancer in an effort to better define the natural history of this disease and to identify those factors affecting long-term survival. Some long-term survivors were found to have risk factors associated with a poor prognosis such as lymph node metastasis or margin involvement. The authors suggest that long-term follow ups of more than 5 years are requisite for determining cure in patients with bile duct cancer and that surgical resection should be actively applied in those with advanced disease.
20
Outcomes After Curative Resections of Cholangiocarcinoma
David M. Nagorney · Archives of Surgery · 1993 · 246 citations
Carcinoma of the Extrahepatic Biliary Tract
William P. Longmire, Michael S. McArthur, Elias Bastounis et al. · Annals of Surgery · 1973 · 205 citations
Outcome of treatment for distal bile duct cancer
Yuman Fong, Leslie H. Blumgart, Emily Lin et al. · British journal of surgery · 1996 · 176 citations