arXiv (Cornell University) · 2013 · 11 citations · 21 references
Natural ResourcesDecision SciencesDemand ForecastingEnergy EconomicsOptimizationDemand ResponseDemand-side ManagementElectricity Load ManagementElectricity MarketsEnergy PricingPower ManagementElectricity PricingPower ConsumptionPower Demand ModelingSpot PricingStochastic Dynamic OptimizationStochastic Dynamic ProgrammingTime-of-day PricingTime-varying Pricing
We formulate optimization problems to study how data centers might modulate their power demands for cost-effective operation taking into account three key complex features exhibited by real-world electricity pricing schemes: (i) time-varying prices (e.g., time-of-day pricing, spot pricing, or higher energy prices during coincident peaks) and (ii) separate charge for peak power consumption. Our focus is on demand modulation at the granularity of an entire data center or a large part of it. For computational tractability reasons, we work with a fluid model for power demands which we imagine can be modulated using two abstract knobs of demand dropping and demand delaying (each with its associated penalties or costs). Given many data center workloads and electric prices can be effectively predicted using statistical modeling techniques, we devise a stochastic dynamic program (SDP) that can leverage such predictive models. Since the SDP can be computationally infeasible in many real platforms, we devise approximations for it. We also devise fully online algorithms that might be useful for scenarios with poor power demand or utility price predictability. For one of our online algorithms, we prove a competitive ratio of 2-1/n. Finally, using empirical evaluation with both real-world and synthetic power demands and real-world prices, we demonstrate the efficacy of our techniques. As two salient empirically-gained insights: (i) demand delaying is more effective than demand dropping regarding to peak shaving (e.g., 10.74% cost saving with only delaying vs. 1.45% with only dropping for Google workload) and (ii) workloads tend to have different cost saving potential under various electricity tariffs (e.g., 16.97% cost saving under peak-based tariff vs. 1.55% under time-varying pricing tariff for Facebook workload).
21
Power provisioning for a warehouse-sized computer
Xiaobo Fan, Wolf-Dietrich Weber, Luiz André Barroso · 2007 · 1.8K citations
Energy-aware server provisioning and load dispatching for connection-intensive internet services
Greening geographical load balancing
Zhenhua Liu, Minghong Lin, Adam Wierman et al. · 2011 · 459 citations
The Case for Evaluating MapReduce Performance Using Workload Suites
Yanpei Chen, Archana Ganapathi, Rean Griffith et al. · 2011 · 433 citations
Data centers power reduction: A two time scale approach for delay tolerant workloads
Yuan Yao, Longbo Huang, Abhihshek Sharma et al. · 2012 · 232 citations