DentistryEndodonticsEndodontic InstrumentationRoot Canal TherapySurgical EndodonticsApical PreparationEndodontic TherapyIrrigation ProtocolsRoot Canal ObturationApical Extrusion Of DebrisApical Extrusion PreventionCanal Wall Debris RemovalDebris Removal EfficiencyEvaluationInstrument ChangeResidual Debris AssessmentRoot Canal Debris Removal
BACKGROUND: To compare the amount of debris extruded apically by using conventional syringe, Endovac & Ultrasonic irrigation. MATERIALS & METHODS: Thirty freshly extracted mandibular premolars were selected, working length was determined and mounted in a debris and collection apparatus. The canals were prepared. After each instrument change, 1 ml. of 3% sodium hypochlorite was used as irrigation. Debris extruded apically by using conventional syringe, endovac& ultrasonic irrigation tech, was measured using the electronic balance to determine its weight and statistical analysis was performed. The mean difference between the groups was determined using statistical analysis within the groups &between the groups for equal variances. RESULTS: Among all the groups, significantly less debris were found apically in the Endovac group (0.96) compared to conventional and ultrasonic group (1.23) syringe. CONCLUSION: The present study showed that endovac system extrudes less amount of debris apically as compared to ultrasonic followed by conventional so incidence of flare up can be reduce by using endovac irrigation system. How to cite this article: Tambe V H, Nagmode P S, Vishwas J R, Saujanya K P, Angadi P, Ali F M. Evaluation of the Amount of Debris extruded apically by using Conventional Syringe, Endovac and Ultrasonic Irrigation Technique: An In Vitro Study. J Int Oral Health 2013; 5(3):63-66.
9
Flare-ups in endodontics: I. Etiological factors
Samuel Seltzer, Irving J. Naidorf · Journal of Endodontics · 1985 · 403 citations
Jale Tanalp, Figen Kaptan, Semih Sert et al. · Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology and Endodontology · 2005 · 152 citations