MedicineGynecologyObstetricsMaternal-fetal MedicinePrenatal DiagnosisReproductive MedicineChorionic Villus SamplingFetal Anomaly DetectionInvasive Prenatal TestingPregnancyPrenatal AssessmentPrenatal CareAntenatal Fetal TestingComparative Accuracy With AmniocentesisDiagnostic Test ProceduresMulticenter Clinical TrialsMulticenter TrialsTransabdominal Chorionic Villus Sampling
Amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling have been shown through prospective, multicenter trials to be safe and effective methods of prenatal diagnosis; accordingly, a knowledge of these tests is important for those physicians who care for women during their childbearing years. We review the indications, techniques, safety, accuracy, and efficacy of amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling and compare the advantages and disadvantages of each diagnostic test. This review should enable physicians to provide appropriate counseling and information to women at increased risk for fetal abnormalities detectable by either of these procedures.
19
RANDOMISED CONTROLLED TRIAL OF GENETIC AMNIOCENTESIS IN 4606 LOW-RISK WOMEN
Ann Tabor, Mette Madsen, Erikb. Obel et al. · The Lancet · 1986 · 873 citations
Medicine, Genetics, Obstetrics +8
Cytogenetic results from the U.S. collaborative study on CVS
David H. Ledbetter, J. M. Zachary, Joe Leigh Simpson et al. · Prenatal Diagnosis · 1992 · 399 citations
Life Sciences, Genetics, Obstetrics +17
Severe limb abnormalities after chorion villus sampling at 56-66 days' gestation
Helen V. Firth, Patricia A. Boyd, R H Lindenbaum et al. · The Lancet · 1991 · 381 citations
Medicine, Obstetrics, Pathology +10