Tax Structures and FDI: The Deterrent Effects of Complexity and Uncertainty

Kelly D. Edmiston, Shannon Mudd, Neven T. Valev

Fiscal Studies · 2003 · 132 citations · 40 references

Concepts

TL;DR

Housing subsidies are justified by merit‑good, external effects, and distribution motives. The study measures distortionary and distributional effects of Dutch housing subsidies. The results show that subsidy patterns are hard to justify, especially for rental versus owner‑occupied and mortgage versus equity financing, and that limited housing supply restricts quality improvements.

Abstract

Abstract This paper measures the distortionary and distributional effects of housing subsidies in the Netherlands. Its broad scope allows us to discuss the results in the light of the main justifications for subsidising housing, i.e. the merit–good argument, external effects and the distribution motive. Our measurements reveal some patterns of subsidisation that seem difficult to justify on these grounds. This applies especially to the differences between subsidisation of rental and owneroccupied housing and between mortgage– and equity–financed ownership. Moreover, the inelastic supply of housing in the Netherlands entails that subsidisation has only a limited effect on promoting housing quality.

References

40