JAMA · 1999 · 136 citations · 9 references
Public HealthPublic Health PracticeEpidemiologyHealth AssessmentPublic Health SurveillanceDisease Reporting LawHealth SurveillanceNotifiable Disease ReportingSurveillance MethodsDisease Reporting MandatesDisease Surveillance ReportingLaboratory Reporting SystemsMandatory Disease ReportingMandatory Reporting ThresholdsNational Disease Reporting SystemsPublic Health Surveillance ReportingRoutine Disease Reporting
Surveillance is a core public health function, and health care professionals play a key role at local, state, and national levels. The study aims to describe state and territorial reporting requirements for diseases and conditions recommended for national public health surveillance. The authors surveyed state and territorial epidemiologists from all 50 states plus NYC, Puerto Rico, and Guam between May and August 1997, and updated the data to reflect reporting requirements as of January 1, 1999, to capture systematic reporting by health care professionals and laboratories. The survey achieved a 100 % response rate from US states and 90 % overall, revealing that of 58 recommended diseases, 35 (60 %) were reportable in >90 % of jurisdictions, 15 (26 %) in 75–90 %, and 8 (14 %) in <75 %; 19 infectious diseases were reportable in all responding states and territories, but reporting varies substantially by jurisdiction.
Surveillance is a key component of the core public health function of health assessment. Systematic reporting by health care professionals and laboratories, which may vary by state law, statute, or regulation, continues to provide essential data for assessing public health.To describe the state and territorial reporting requirements for diseases and conditions recommended for national public health surveillance.Between May and August 1997, the state and territorial epidemiologists from all 50 states, in addition to New York City, Puerto Rico, and Guam, completed questionnaires indicating which diseases and conditions were reportable by health care professionals and laboratories in their jurisdictions. The surveys were subsequently updated to reflect reporting requirements current as of January 1, 1999. The overall response rate for the survey was 100% for US states and 90% overall, including the territories.State and territorial reporting requirements for diseases and conditions of public health concern.Of the 58 diseases and conditions recommended for national reporting, 35 (60%) were reportable in greater than 90% of the states and territories, 15 (26%) were reportable in 75% to 90%, and 8 (14%) were reportable in less than 75%. Nineteen of the infectious diseases were reportable in all of the states and territories that responded.Required reporting varies substantially by state or territory. Health care professionals are integral to public health efforts at the local, state, and national levels.
9
Case Definitions for Public Health Surveillance
Melinda Wharton, Terence Chorba, Richard L. Vogt et al. · PsycEXTRA Dataset · 1990 · 460 citations
Public Health, Public Health Practice, Disease Surveillance +7
Guidelines for evaluating surveillance systems
Douglas N. Klaucke, James W. Buehler, Stephen B. Thacker et al. · 1988 · 290 citations
Public Health, Public Health Practice, Disease Surveillance +13
Guidelines for evaluating surveillance systems.
PubMed · 1988 · 213 citations
Summary of notifiable diseases, United States, 1987.
PubMed · 1988 · 132 citations
Public Health, Infectious Disease Control, Infectious Diseases +16
Mandatory Reporting of Infectious Diseases by Clinicians
Terence Chorba · JAMA · 1989 · 108 citations
Law, Health Law, Infectious Diseases +17