Concepedia

Publication | Open Access

At the heart of REDD+: a role for local people in monitoring forests?

201

Citations

28

References

2010

Year

TLDR

REDD+ is a UNFCCC‑agreed policy to curb deforestation emissions, yet linking remote sensing to local implementation and measuring degradation remains challenging, a gap that community‑based monitoring can help bridge. The study seeks to reduce CO₂ emissions from developing countries through sustainable forest management and to propose how local REDD+ monitoring can be established to deliver biodiversity and livelihood co‑benefits. The authors propose a framework for establishing local REDD+ monitoring by leveraging community participation to collect forest condition data. Local communities can collect forest condition data with comparable quality to scientists at half the cost, and empowering them to monitor carbon stocks offers a rapid, cost‑effective means to absorb CO₂ while supporting livelihoods and biodiversity.

Abstract

Reduced Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation in Developing Countries (REDD+) is a policy mechanism now agreed under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). It aims to reduce carbon dioxide emissions from developing countries through the sustainable management of forests, while providing co-benefits of biodiversity conservation and livelihood support. Implementation challenges include linking remote sensing and national forest inventories of carbon stocks, to local implementation and measuring carbon loss from forest degradation. Community-based forest monitoring can help overcome some of these challenges. We show that local people can collect forest condition data of comparable quality to trained scientists, at half the cost. We draw on our experience to propose how and where local REDD+ monitoring can be established. Empowering communities to own and monitor carbon stocks could provide a rapid and cost-effective way of absorbing carbon dioxide emissions, while potentially contributing to local livelihoods and forest biodiversity conservation.

References

YearCitations

Page 1