Publication | Closed Access
Comparison of Sensitivity Coefficient Calculation Methods in Automatic History Matching
43
Citations
15
References
1981
Year
Numerical AnalysisEngineeringAutomatic History MatchingCorpus LinguisticsReservoir EngineeringNumerical ComputationInformation RetrievalData ScienceData MiningPattern RecognitionNumerical SimulationSystems EngineeringSensitivity CoefficientsSensitivity AnalysisModeling And SimulationStatisticsReservoir CharacterizationReliabilityAutomatic HistoryReservoir VariablesMatching TechniqueInverse ProblemsReservoir SimulationReservoir ModelingRecord LinkageRobust ModelingNumerical TreatmentNumerical Methods
Abstract The efficiency of automatic history matching algorithms depends on two factors: the computation time needed per iteration and the number of iterations needed for convergence. In most history matching algorithms, the most time-consuming aspect is the calculation of the sensitivity coefficients – the derivatives of the reservoir variables (pressure and saturation) with respect to the reservoir properties (permeabilities and porosity). This paper presents an analysis of two methods – the direct and the variational – for calculating sensitivity coefficients, with particular emphasis on the computational requirements of the methods. If the simulator consists of a set of N ordinary differential equations for the grid-block variables (e.g., pressures) and there are M parameters for which the sensitivity coefficients are desired, the ratio of the computational efforts of the direct to the variational method is R = N ( M + 1 ) N ( N + 1 ) + M . Thus, for M<N the direct method is more economical, whereas as M increases, a point is reached at which the variational method is preferred.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1