PubMed · 1996 · 64 citations · 0 references
DentistryDental Materials ScienceRestorative DentistryDental MaterialsDirect RestorationsProsthodontic MaterialsCervical Lesion RestorationsComposite Resin RestorationsDental ErosionGlass Ionomer Cement RestorationsGlass Ionomer CementsRestorative Material SelectionCervical Abrasion ManagementCervical Canal LesionsCervical ErosionCervical Squamous LesionsGlass Ionomer CompositesLongevity Of Restorative MaterialsResin Composite PlacementRestorative Materials
Three restorative materials used for cervical erosion /abrasion lesions were evaluated clinically after 10 years. Thirty adult patients with at least four cervical lesions received one restoration of each of Ketac-Fil, finished immediately, Ketac-Fil, finished after a delay, Chelon-FIl (all glass-ionomer cements), and Cervident (a resin composite). Restorations were placed without any tooth preparations. Eighteen patients returned for their 10-year examinations. Two experienced examiners provided the periodic evaluations. Complete retention at 10 years was 83% for Ketac-Fil, finished immediately; 78% for Ketac-Fil, finished after a delay; 67% for Chelon-Fil; and 17% for Cervident. All three glass-ionomer restorative materials exhibited statistically significantly greater retention that did Cervident. When a noninvasive procedure is desired, glass-ionomer materials are the restorative material of choice for abrasion/erosion lesions because of their long-term retention values.