Journal of Agricultural Biological and Environmental Statistics · 2015 · 39 citations · 17 references
Natural ResourcesEcologyZoologySpatial EcologySpatial ModelingSpatial StatisticsAbundance EstimationField Sampling DesignSampling DesignSampling MethodsSampling TheorySpatial SamplingCapture-recapture ModelsDistance SamplingModel-based SamplingModel-based Spatial SamplingSpatial Abundance EstimationSpecies Abundance EstimationSpecies Detection ModelingStatistical Abundance Estimation
Conventional distance sampling adopts a mixed approach, using model-based methods for the detection process, and design-based methods to estimate animal abundance in the study region, given estimated probabilities of detection. In recent years, there has been increasing interest in fully model-based methods. Model-based methods are less robust for estimating animal abundance than conventional methods, but offer several advantages: they allow the analyst to explore how animal density varies by habitat or topography; abundance can be estimated for any sub-region of interest; they provide tools for analysing data from designed distance sampling experiments, to assess treatment effects. We develop a common framework for model-based distance sampling, and show how the various model-based methods that have been proposed fit within this framework.
17
MODELING ABUNDANCE EFFECTS IN DISTANCE SAMPLING
J. Andrew Royle, Scott C. Bates · Ecology · 2004 · 330 citations
Life Sciences, Ecology, Zoology +17
Incorporating Covariates into Standard Line Transect Analyses
Fernanda F. C. Marques, S. T. Buckland · Biometrics · 2003 · 254 citations
Computing, Biostatistics, Zoology +12
Accommodating Unmodeled Heterogeneity in Double‐Observer Distance Sampling Surveys
David L. Borchers, Jeffrey L. Laake, Colin Southwell et al. · Biometrics · 2005 · 175 citations
Life Sciences, Ecology, Zoology +13