Journal of Neuroscience · 1998 · 558 citations · 59 references
Life SciencesNeurobiologyNeuroscienceCellular NeuroscienceCytoskeletonMolecular NeuroscienceActin FilamentsActin PolymerizationNeuronal CytoskeletonNeurotransmissionNeurotransmitter ReceptorsSynaptic TransmissionActin Cytoskeleton DynamicsActin Cytoskeleton RemodelingActin Cytoskeleton ReorganizationAmpa ReceptorsDendritic SpinesNmda ReceptorsSynaptic Localization Of ReceptorsSynaptic Reorganization
The authors employed actin‑perturbing drugs and detergent extraction on primary hippocampal cultures to directly assess how the actin cytoskeleton anchors GABA A, AMPA, and NMDA receptors and associated proteins at postsynaptic sites. Depolymerizing F‑actin with latrunculin A reduced synaptic NMDA and AMPA receptor clusters by ~40%, while nonsynaptic NMDA receptors remained clustered, α‑actinin‑2 dissociated from clusters, PSD‑95 stayed bound, and AMPA receptors redistributed or dispersed depending on neuron type, revealing distinct anchoring mechanisms for different receptors and cell types.
We used actin-perturbing agents and detergent extraction of primary hippocampal cultures to test directly the role of the actin cytoskeleton in localizing GABA A receptors, AMPA- and NMDA-type glutamate receptors, and potential anchoring proteins at postsynaptic sites. Excitatory postsynaptic sites on dendritic spines contained a high concentration of F-actin that was resistant to cytochalasin D but could be depolymerized using the novel compound latrunculin A. Depolymerization of F-actin led to a 40% decrease in both the number of synaptic NMDA receptor (NMDAR1) clusters and the number of AMPA receptor (GluR1)-labeled spines. The nonsynaptic NMDA receptors appeared to remain clustered and to coalesce in cell bodies. α-Actinin-2, which binds both actin and NMDA receptors, dissociated from the receptor clusters, but PSD-95 remained associated with both the synaptic and nonsynaptic receptor clusters, consistent with a proposed cross-linking function. AMPA receptors behaved differently; on GABAergic neurons, the clusters redistributed to nonsynaptic sites, whereas on pyramidal neurons, many of the clusters appeared to disperse. Furthermore, in control neurons, AMPA receptors were detergent extractable from pyramidal cell spines, whereas AMPA receptors on GABAergic neurons and NMDA receptors were unextractable. GABA A receptors were not dependent on F-actin for the maintenance or synaptic localization of clusters. These results indicate fundamental differences in the mechanisms of receptor anchoring at postsynaptic sites, both regarding the anchoring of a single receptor (the AMPA receptor) in pyramidal cells versus GABAergic interneurons and regarding the anchoring of different receptors (AMPA vs NMDA receptors) at a single class of postsynaptic sites on pyramidal cell dendritic spines.
59
Rat hippocampal neurons in dispersed cell culture
Gary Banker, William Cowan · Brain Research · 1977 · 1.1K citations
Homer: a protein that selectively binds metabotropic glutamate receptors
Paul Brakeman, Anthony A. Lanahan, Richard O’Brien et al. · Nature · 1997 · 1.1K citations