Physical Review A · 2015 · 40 citations · 22 references
ComputingComputer SciencePhysicsFault ToleranceQuantum ComputingQuantum MechanicsQuantum BitsQuantum CircuitsQuantum ComputationQuantum GatesSuperconducting QubitsArbitrary Unitary GatesLeakageLeakage ErrorsQuantum BenchmarkingQubit FidelityQubit LeakageRandomized BenchmarkingTransmon Qubits
Randomized Benchmarking efficiently characterizes the average error of a unitary 2‑design such as the Clifford group, but assumes no non‑computational leakage levels, a condition relevant for superconducting transmon qubits. The study investigates leakage errors in Randomized Benchmarking caused by an extra level per qubit and proposes a modified protocol to reliably estimate gate error rates in their presence. The authors modify the standard protocol and analyze the variance of sequence fidelity to determine the number of random sequences required for accurate fidelity estimation. The protocol supports gate‑dependent error channels beyond perturbative regimes, is compatible with Interleaved Randomized Benchmarking, and extends to benchmarking arbitrary gates.
Randomized Benchmarking allows to efficiently and scalably characterize the average error of an unitary 2-design such as the Clifford group $\mathcal{C}$ on a physical candidate for quantum computation, as long as there are no non-computational leakage levels in the system. We investigate the effect of leakage errors on Randomized Benchmarking induced from an additional level per physical qubit and provide a modified protocol that allows to derive reliable estimates for the error per gate in their presence. We assess the variance of the sequence fidelity corresponding to the number of random sequences needed for valid fidelity estimation. Our protocol allows for gate dependent error channels without being restricted to perturbations. We show that our protocol is compatible with Interleaved Randomized Benchmarking and expand to benchmarking of arbitrary gates. This setting is relevant for superconducting transmon qubits, among other systems.
22
<i>Quantum Computation and Quantum Information</i>
Michael A. Nielsen, Isaac L. Chuang, Lov K. Grover · American Journal of Physics · 2002 · 22.7K citations
Quantum computation and quantum information
Jim Law · ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes · 2001 · 19.2K citations
Computing, Computer Science, Physics +13
Matrix analysis and applied linear algebra
Choice Reviews Online · 2001 · 3.4K citations
Superconducting quantum circuits at the surface code threshold for fault tolerance
R. Barends, J. Kelly, A. Megrant et al. · Nature · 2014 · 1.8K citations · Full text
Randomized benchmarking of quantum gates
Emanuel Knill, D. Leibfried, R. Reichle et al. · Physical Review A · 2008 · 1K citations · Full text
Computing, Computer Science, Physics +16