BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · 2011 · 36 citations · 38 references
MedicineGynecologySurgeryGynecologic OncologyOncologic SurgerySurgical OncologyCervical SurgeryGynecologic Oncology SurgeryLaparoscopic SurgeryMinimally Invasive SurgeryVaginal SurgeryAbdominal HysterectomyHospital Stay DurationLaparoscopic HysterectomyLaparoscopic-assisted SurgeryMinimally Invasive Gynecologic Oncology SurgeryPelvic LymphadenectomyRobotic HysterectomyVaginal Hysterectomy
Please cite this paper as: Koehler C, Gottschalk E, Chiantera V, Marnitz S, Hasenbein K, Schneider A. From laparoscopic assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy to vaginal assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy. BJOG 2012;119:254–262. Radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy is the standard surgical treatment for patients with early stage cervical cancer. The majority of radical hysterectomies are performed with the open technique. However, laparoscopic, combined laparoscopic and vaginal, and robotic‐assisted approaches may also be used. Compared with the abdominal radical hysterectomy (ARH), laparoscopic techniques are associated with less blood loss, shorter hospital stay, better cosmesis, and faster recovery. A further breakthrough in laparoscopic technique can only be made if safety and oncological clearance are comparable with ARH. We describe the technique and results of laparoscopic assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy and the transition to vaginal assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy.
38
Randomised study of radical surgery versus radiotherapy for stage Ib-IIa cervical cancer
Fabio Landoni, Andrea Maneo, Alessandro Colombo et al. · The Lancet · 1997 · 1.7K citations
Nick M. Spirtos, Scott M. Eisenkop, John B. Schlaerth et al. · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2002 · 228 citations
Medicine, Gynecology, Surgery +13