R&D Appropriability, Opportunity, and Market Structure: New Evidence on Some Schumpeterian Hypotheses

Richard C. Levin, Wesley M. Cohen, David C. Mowery

American Economic Review · 1985 · 569 citations · 1 references

Concepts

TL;DR

Schumpeterian hypotheses on how firm size and market concentration influence R&D spending and technological progress have been extensively studied in industrial organization. This study reexamines the impact of market concentration on R&D and technological progress at the industry level using new data on R&D appropriability and technological opportunity. The analysis uses data from a 1984 survey of R&D executives across 130 industries.

Abstract

One of the largest bodies of literature in the field of industrial organization is devoted to the interpretation and testing of several hypotheses advanced by Joseph Schumpeter (1950) concerning innovation and industrial market structure. One set of hypotheses focuses on the role of firm size as a determinant of R&D spending and the rate of technological advance. Another set focuses on the effect of market concentration on R&D and technological advance. In this paper, we reexamine the latter set of hypotheses at the industry level, using new data on R&D appropriability and technological opportunity collected by Levin et al. (1984) in a survey of R&D executives in 130 industries.

References

1