Urologia Internationalis · 2001 · 13 citations · 15 references
MedicineOncologyPharmacologyChemotherapyOncology PharmacotherapyUrologic OncologyAdverse Effects Of ChemotherapyBladder CancerCombination ChemotherapyAntiemetic ResponseAntiemetic TolerabilityChemotherapy Toxicity PreventionElectrical Stimulation
OBJECTIVE: To find out whether the combination of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) and ondansetron had an increased antiemetic effect. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fourteen testis and 11 bladder cancer patients were scheduled for 4 cycles of bleomycin-etoposide-cisplatin (BEP) or methotrexate-vinblastine-etoposide-cisplatin (MVEC) combination chemotherapy, respectively. At each cycle the whole cisplatin dose was given in 1 day that is 100 mg/m(2)/day in the BEP and 70 mg/m(2)/day in the MVEC protocols. Ondansetron was given at a dose of 12 mg/day and TENS was applied by commercially available 'Relief Band'(Maven Labs, Inc., Citrus Heights, Calif., USA). The first 3 cycles of each case were blindly randomized to one of the following regimens; TENS vs. ondansetron vs. a combination of both. The regimens were applied during the administration of cisplatin and the patients were asked to report their nausea according to a scale between 0 to 10. Also for each regimen the number of emetic attacks experienced during the administration of cisplatin was recorded by the same observer. Then the scores of each regimen were compared. RESULTS: The mean nausea scores for regimens TENS, ondansetron and TENS + ondansetron were found to be 5.12 +/- 2.54, 3.0 +/- 1.71 and 0.8 +/- 0.96, respectively. Ondansetron was better than TENS in preventing nausea (p = 0.000). However the combination of TENS and ondansetron resulted in a significant decrease in nausea scores when compared to TENS alone (p = 0.000) or ondansetron alone (p = 0.000). The mean number of emetic attacks for the TENS, ondansetron and TENS + ondansetron regimens were 3.16 +/- 1.84, 1.64 +/- 1.44 and 0.56 +/- 0.82, respectively. A statistically significant difference was present between the number of emetic attacks observed with the TENS + ondansetron combination and TENS alone (p = 0.000) or ondansetron alone (p = 0.001). Ondansetron was again better than TENS in preventing emetic attacks (p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: The use of TENS as an adjunct to ondansetron therapy has provided significant benefit in preventing nausea and emetic attacks caused by cisplatin.
15
Traditional Chinese acupuncture: a potentially useful antiemetic?
J. W. Dundee, W. N. Chestnutt, R. G. Ghaly et al. · BMJ · 1986 · 214 citations · Full text
Medicine, Pharmacotherapy, Surgery +16
5-hydroxytryptamine m-receptor antagonism to prevent cisplatin-induced emesis
B. Costall, A.M. Domeney, R.J. Naylor et al. · Neuropharmacology · 1986 · 188 citations
Medicine, Oncology, Pharmacology +10
J. Hawthorn, K. J. Ostler, Paul Andrews · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Physiology · 1988 · 150 citations · Full text
Medicine, Neuroscience, Pharmacology +14