Publication | Closed Access
<scp>I</scp>ntervention: Critical physical geography
278
Citations
85
References
2013
Year
Historical GeographyEngineeringIntegrated GeographyPhysical GeographyGeodiversitySocial SciencesPolitical EcologyGeophysicsCritical Physical GeographyCpg WorkGeographic Information SciencesCommunity GeographyUrban StudiesGeopoliticsClimate ChangeCultural GeographyGeohumanitiesGeographyEnvironmental HistoryInterdisciplinary StudiesEnvironmental JusticeCpg ResearchPolitical GeographyNatural SciencesGeoethicsCritical GeographyAnthropologyGeospatial PerspectiveEthical Geography
Recent debate questions whether geography’s interdisciplinary nature is a relic or a source of intellectual vitality. The authors advocate sustained integration of physical and critical human geography, reviewing existing work and outlining benefits and strategies for critical physical geography. Critical physical geography fuses critical scrutiny of power with deep biophysical knowledge to transform society and the environment, and the authors review current examples and discuss their benefits. The authors contend that critical physical geography enhances intellectual rigor and political relevance in both physical and critical human geography, because socio‑biophysical landscapes are shaped by power, colonial history, and inequities as much as by hydrology, ecology, and climate.
Abstract A recent opinion piece rekindled debate as to whether geography's current interdisciplinary make‐up is a historical relic or an actual and potential source of intellectual vitality. Taking the latter position, we argue here for the benefits of sustained integration of physical and critical human geography. For reasons both political and pragmatic, we term this area of intermingled research and practice critical physical geography (CPG). CPG combines critical attention to power relations with deep knowledge of biophysical science or technology in the service of social and environmental transformation. We argue that whether practiced by individuals or teams, CPG research can improve the intellectual quality and expand the political relevance of both physical and critical human geography because it is increasingly impractical to separate analysis of natural and social systems: socio‐biophysical landscapes are as much the product of unequal power relations, histories of colonialism, and racial and gender disparities as they are of hydrology, ecology, and climate change. Here, we review existing CPG work; discuss the primary benefits of critically engaged integrative research, teaching, and practice; and offer our collective thoughts on how to make CPG work.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1