Arterial oxygenation influences central motor output and exercise performance via effects on peripheral locomotor muscle fatigue in humans

TLDR

Arterial oxygen content strongly influences the rate at which peripheral locomotor muscles fatigue. The study investigated how arterial oxygen levels affect exercise performance and their interaction with quadriceps fatigue. Eight trained men completed 5‑km cycling time trials at four arterial oxygen levels, while quadriceps fatigue was measured by force changes after magnetic nerve stimulation and central drive was estimated from EMG. Higher arterial oxygen increased central drive, power output, and time‑trial performance, but did not alter quadriceps fatigue, suggesting that oxygen’s performance benefit is mainly mediated by central motor regulation rather than changes in peripheral fatigue.

Abstract

Changing arterial oxygen content (C(aO(2))) has a highly sensitive influence on the rate of peripheral locomotor muscle fatigue development. We examined the effects of C(aO(2)) on exercise performance and its interaction with peripheral quadriceps fatigue. Eight trained males performed four 5 km cycling time trials (power output voluntarily adjustable) at four levels of C(aO(2)) (17.6-24.4 ml O(2) dl(-1)), induced by variations in inspired O(2) fraction (0.15-1.0). Peripheral quadriceps fatigue was assessed via changes in force output pre- versus post-exercise in response to supra-maximal magnetic femoral nerve stimulation (DeltaQ(tw); 1-100 Hz). Central neural drive during the time trials was estimated via quadriceps electromyogram. Increased C(aO(2)) from hypoxia to hyperoxia resulted in parallel increases in central neural output (43%) and power output (30%) during cycling and improved time trial performance (12%); however, the magnitude of DeltaQ(tw) (-33 to -35%) induced by the exercise was not different among the four time trials (P > 0.2). These effects of C(aO(2)) on time trial performance and DeltaQ(tw) were reproducible (coefficient of variation = 1-6%) over repeated trials at each F(IO(2)) on separate days. In the same subjects, changing C(aO(2)) also affected performance time to exhaustion at a fixed work rate, but similarly there was no effect of Delta C(aO(2)) on peripheral fatigue. Based on these results, we hypothesize that the effect of C(aO(2)) on locomotor muscle power output and exercise performance time is determined to a significant extent by the regulation of central motor output to the working muscle in order that peripheral muscle fatigue does not exceed a critical threshold.