Frontiers in Genetics · 2015 · 144 citations · 66 references
Life SciencesBiologyGeneticsComparative GeneticsMicroevolutionQuantitative GeneticsEpistasisGene-environment InteractionGenetic VariationGenotype-phenotype CorrelationGenotype-phenotype CouplingPhenotypic VariationEnvironmental Effects On PhenotypeGenotype Phenotype RelationshipGenotype-phenotype AssociationsGenotype-phenotype LinkageGenotype-phenotype MappingGenotype-to-phenotype AssociationGenotype-to-phenotype MappingPleiotropy
Biology traditionally models phenotypes as arising from interactions among multiple genes and environmental factors, yet this approach often departs from a differential view of genotype‑phenotype relationships, highlighting the need for a deeper understanding of their intricate link. The study re‑emphasizes that the genotype‑phenotype relationship is best viewed as a connection between two differences, one at the genetic level and one at the phenotypic level. In such cases, it is relevant to view genotype‑phenotype relationships as differences embedded into differences. The differential view of phenotype‑genotype relationships, treating differences embedded in differences, proves useful for explaining pervasive pleiotropy, epistasis, and environmental effects, and clarifies comparisons between genetic and environmental influences on phenotypes.
An integrative view of diversity and singularity in the living world requires a better understanding of the intricate link between genotypes and phenotypes. Here we re-emphasize the old standpoint that the genotype-phenotype relationship is best viewed as a connection between two differences, one at the genetic level and one at the phenotypic level. As of today, predominant thinking in biology research is that multiple genes interact with multiple environmental variables (such as abiotic factors, culture, or symbionts) to produce the phenotype. Often, the problem of linking genotypes and phenotypes is framed in terms of genotype and phenotype maps, and such graphical representations implicitly bring us away from the differential view of genotype-phenotype relationships. Here we show that the differential view of phenotype-genotype relationships is a useful explanatory framework in the context of pervasive pleiotropy, epistasis and environmental effects. In such cases, it is relevant to view genotype-phenotype relationships as differences embedded into differences. Thinking in terms of differences clarifies the comparison between environmental and genetic effects on phenotypes and helps to further understand the connection between genotypes and phenotypes.
66
Genetics and Analysis of Quantitative Traits
Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics · 2002 · 6.3K citations
Life Sciences, Biology, Genetics +12
Javier A. Bravo, Paul Forsythe, Marianne V. Chew et al. · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · 2011 · 3.8K citations · Full text
The NHGRI GWAS Catalog, a curated resource of SNP-trait associations
Danielle Welter, Jacqueline A. L. MacArthur, Joannella Morales et al. · Nucleic Acids Research · 2013 · 2.9K citations · Full text
The genomic basis of adaptive evolution in threespine sticklebacks
Felicity C. Jones, Manfred Grabherr, Yingguang Frank Chan et al. · Nature · 2012 · 1.9K citations · Full text