North American Actuarial Journal · 2001 · 63 citations · 15 references
Public AffairsEconomicsInsuranceFinancial EconomicsInsurance EconomicsSocial InsuranceOld-age Income SecurityPension InsurancePension PolicyRetirement PolicyRetirement Security PolicyVariable Life InsurancePension AnnuitiesRetirement AnnuitiesRetirement Saving DecisionsRetirement Savings PolicyVariable AnnuitiesVariable Annuity FeaturesVariable Annuity GuaranteesVariable Annuity Regulation
Abstract At, or about, the age of retirement, most individuals must decide what additional fraction of their marketable wealth, if any, should be annuitized. Annuitization means purchasing a nonrefundable life annuity from an insurance company, which then guarantees a lifelong consumption stream that cannot be outlived. The decision of whether or not to annuitize additional liquid assets is a difficult one, since it is clearly irreversible and can prove costly in hindsight. Obviously, for a large group of people, the bulk of financial wealth is forcefully annuitized, for example, company pensions and social security. For others, especially as it pertains to personal pension plans, such as 401(k), 403(b), and IRA plans as well as variable annuity contracts, there is much discretion in the matter. The purpose of this paper is to focus on the question of when and if to annuitize. Specifically, my objective is to provide practical advice aimed at individual retirees and their advisors. My main conclusions are as follows: • Annuitization of assets provides unique and valuable longevity insurance and should be actively encouraged at higher ages. Standard microeconomic utility-based arguments indicate that consumers would be willing to pay a substantial “loading” in order to gain access to a life annuity. • The large adverse selection costs associated with life annuities, which range from 10% to 20%, might serve as a strong deterrent to full annuitization. • Retirees with a (strong) bequest motive might be inclined to self-annuitize during the early stages of retirement. Indeed, it appears that most individuals—faced with expensive annuity products—can effectively “beat” the rate of return from a fixed immediate annuity until age 75�80. I call this strategy consume term and invest the difference. • Variable immediate annuities (VIAs) combine equity market participation together with longevity insurance. This financial product is currently underutilized (and not available in certain jurisdictions) and can only grow in popularity.
15
The Pricing of Options and Corporate Liabilities
Fischer Black, Myron S. Scholes · Journal of Political Economy · 1973 · 29.4K citations
A Theory of the Term Structure of Interest Rates
John C. Cox, Jonathan E. Ingersoll, Stephen A. Ross · Econometrica · 1985 · 8.6K citations
American Economic Review · 2012 · 8.1K citations
An Empirical Comparison of Alternative Models of the Short‐Term Interest Rate
K.C. Chan, George Andrew Karolyi, Francis A. Longstaff et al. · The Journal of Finance · 1992 · 1.7K citations