Publication | Closed Access
Health Industry Practices That Create Conflicts of Interest
75
Citations
21
References
2006
Year
Health AdministrationBiomedical EthicLawHealth Care IndustryResearch EthicsHealth LawHealthcare MarketingMedical LawMoral RequirementsHealthcare EthicPublic HealthIntellectual PropertyHealth Services ResearchPharmaceutical CareHealth PolicyMarketingMedical ProfessionalismMedical EthicsInformed ConsentHealth Services CompetitionHealth Industry
Conflicts of interest between physicians’ commitment to patient care and pharmaceutical companies’ sales motives challenge medical professionalism, arising when physicians’ motives or situations could compromise their moral duties, and studies show that current self‑regulation of marketing, gifts, and other practices fails to adequately protect patients. More stringent regulation is necessary, including the elimination or modification of common practices related to small gifts, pharmaceutical samples, continuing medical education, funds for physician travel, speakers bureaus, ghostwriting, and consulting and research contracts. We propose a policy under which academic medical centers would take the lead in eliminating the conflicts of interest that still characterize the relationship between physicians and the health care industry. Research shows that existing self‑regulation of marketing, gifts, and related practices does not adequately safeguard patient interests.
Conflicts of interest between physicians' commitment to patient care and the desire of pharmaceutical companies and their representatives to sell their products pose challenges to the principles of medical professionalism. These conflicts occur when physicians have motives or are in situations for which reasonable observers could conclude that the moral requirements of the physician's roles are or will be compromised. Although physician groups, the manufacturers, and the federal government have instituted self-regulation of marketing, research in the psychology and social science of gift receipt and giving indicates that current controls will not satisfactorily protect the interests of patients. More stringent regulation is necessary, including the elimination or modification of common practices related to small gifts, pharmaceutical samples, continuing medical education, funds for physician travel, speakers bureaus, ghostwriting, and consulting and research contracts. We propose a policy under which academic medical centers would take the lead in eliminating the conflicts of interest that still characterize the relationship between physicians and the health care industry.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1