ArXiv.org · 2008 · 64 citations · 13 references
ComputingComputer ScienceMathematicsCombinatoricsCryptographyTheory Of ComputationCircuit ComplexityCommunication ComplexityComputational ComplexityCryptographic ComplexityProof ComplexityRandomized ComplexityBoolean FunctionsCommunication Complexity Lower BoundsCommunication Complexity Upper BoundsDisjointnessLower BoundsMulti-party Communication ComplexityProof Size Lower BoundsRandomized Communication Complexity
We obtain a lower bound of n^Omega(1) on the k-party randomized communication complexity of the Disjointness function in the `Number on the Forehead' model of multiparty communication when k is a constant. For k=o(loglog n), the bounds remain super-polylogarithmic i.e. (log n)^omega(1). The previous best lower bound for three players until recently was Omega(log n). Our bound separates the communication complexity classes NP^{CC}_k and BPP^{CC}_k for k=o(loglog n). Furthermore, by the results of Beame, Pitassi and Segerlind \cite{BPS07}, our bound implies proof size lower bounds for tree-like, degree k-1 threshold systems and superpolynomial size lower bounds for Lovasz-Schrijver proofs. Sherstov \cite{She07b} recently developed a novel technique to obtain lower bounds on two-party communication using the approximate polynomial degree of boolean functions. We obtain our results by extending his technique to the multi-party setting using ideas from Chattopadhyay \cite{Cha07}. A similar bound for Disjointness has been recently and independently obtained by Lee and Shraibman.
13
Complexity classes in communication complexity theory
László Babai, Péter Frankl, Janoš Šimon · 1986 · 318 citations · Full text
Ashok Chandra, Merrick L. Furst, Richard J. Lipton · 1983 · 269 citations