Publication | Closed Access
Blinded vs. unblinded peer review of manuscripts submitted to a dermatology journal: a randomized multi-rater study
57
Citations
5
References
2011
Year
It seems, at least in the case of one dermatology journal, that blinding during peer review does not appear to affect the disposition of the manuscript. To the extent that review word count is a proxy for review quality, there appears to be no quality difference associated with blinding.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1