Journal of Animal Ecology · 2006 · 56 citations · 44 references
Life SciencesEcologyZoologyBehavioral EcologyCommunity EcologyPopulation EcologyAnimal EcologyFeeding EcologyForaging EcologyPrimate EcologyResource Use BehaviorSpecies CoexistenceDensityDominant SpeciesSocial Foraging
1. We examined mechanisms of coexistence between two congeneric species of frugivorous primates, the blue monkey (Cercopithecus mitis) and the red-tailed monkey (C. ascanius). 2. We used giving-up densities (the amount of food which animals leave in a patch) in fruit trees to measure foraging efficiency and to evaluate possible mechanisms of coexistence. Animals with higher giving-up densities are less likely to persist in the company of those with lower giving-up densities because the former are not able to exploit food patches used previously by the latter. We climbed trees to estimate giving-up densities by counting the fruit which primates left behind. 3. We tested five possible mechanisms of coexistence. Three mechanisms proposed that each frugivorous species has a lower giving-up density than the other in at least one of the following: (1) different tree species, (2) within-tree foraging zones or (3) seasons. The fourth mechanism predicted that the socially dominant species exploits resources first and that the subordinate species has lower giving-up densities. The final mechanism predicted that one species would find resources more quickly than the other, which would in turn have a lower giving-up density. 4. Four of the five mechanisms received no support from our data. Only a trade-off between interspecific dominance and giving-up densities was supported. 5. We discuss the generality of our results and possible interactions with other factors.
44
William H. Baltosser, Jerrold H. Zar · Ecology · 1996 · 35.5K citations
Primate adaptation and evolution
Choice Reviews Online · 1989 · 1.3K citations