System Dynamics Review · 2015 · 12 citations · 14 references
EngineeringSystems EngineeringDynamical SystemsSystem DynamicsSystems AnalysisComplex Systems ModelingDynamic Systems AnalysisDynamic Systems ModelingSystem ArchetypesSystem IdentificationSystem StructureArchetype-based DiagnosisDominance AnalysisHeuristicsIdentification Of Dynamical SystemsLoop DominanceModel Structure AnalysisModel-based DiagnosisStructural Archetypes
Abstract Traditionally, model analysis follows qualitative, heuristic, and trial‐and‐error‐driven approaches for testing dynamic hypotheses. Only recently have other methods like loop dominance analysis or control theory been proposed for this purpose. We advocate complementing established qualitative heuristics with a quantitative method for model analysis. To that end, we propose two algorithms to detect Wolstenholme's four generic problem archetypes within models. We tested these algorithms using the Maintenance and World Dynamics models. The approach presented in this paper is a first important step towards the identification of system archetypes in system dynamics and contributes to improving model analysis and diagnosis. Furthermore, our approach goes beyond diagnosis to eliciting solution archetypes, which foster the design and implementation of effective policies. Copyright © 2015 System Dynamics Society
14
Adhi Harmoko S, M.Komp, Joseph Marie Jacquard et al. · 2005 · 18.4K citations
Depth-First Search and Linear Graph Algorithms
Robert E. Tarjan · SIAM Journal on Computing · 1972 · 6K citations
A Graph-theoretic perspective on centrality
Stephen P. Borgatti, Martin G. Everett · Social Networks · 2006 · 1.7K citations
System dynamics, systems thinking, and soft OR
Jay W. Forrester · System Dynamics Review · 1994 · 1.1K citations