International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology · 2015 · 49 citations · 38 references
MedicineOtolaryngologyCost-utility AnalysisOutcomes ResearchRhinologyChronic RhinosinusitisEndoscopic Sinus SurgeryHealth Care OutcomesHealth-state Utility MeasurementOutcome AssessmentPatient-reported Outcome MeasuresBaseline Health ProfileClinical Utility AnalysisHealth Outcomes AnalysisHealth Utility ValuationLongitudinal Correlation StudyPatient-reported Utility MeasurementRefractory Chronic RhinosinusitisRepeated Measures Analysis
BACKGROUND: A health utility value represents an individual's preference for living in a specific health state and is used in cost-utility analyses. This study investigates the impact of continuing medical therapy on health utility outcomes in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). METHODS: The Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-6D (SF-6D) questionnaire was administered to patients prospectively enrolled in a longitudinal study examining treatment outcomes for CRS. Patients were prescribed robust, initial medical therapy and then elected to continue with medical therapy (n = 40) or undergo endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS), followed by medical therapy (n = 152). Patients observed through treatment crossover to ESS were also evaluated (n = 20). Health utility values (SF-6D) were generated at baseline, 6-months, and 12-months follow-up for both cohorts and evaluated using repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA). RESULTS: Treatment crossover patients were found to have a significantly higher prevalence of previous sinus surgery compared to medical management (χ(2) = 6.91; p = 0.009) and surgical intervention (χ(2) = 8.11; p = 0.004) subgroups. Mean baseline utility value for the medical therapy cohort was significantly better compared to the ESS cohort (mean ± standard deviation; 0.76 ± 0.12 vs 0.70 ± 0.15; p = 0.023). Significant improvement in health utility was reported in the ESS cohort (F(2) = 37.69; p < 0.001), whereas values remained stable, without significant improvement, in both the medical therapy cohort (F(2) = 0.03; p = 0.967) and treatment crossover cohort (F(2) = 2.36; p = 0.115). CONCLUSION: Patients electing continued medical management report better baseline health utility compared to patients electing ESS. Patients electing ESS show significant improvement in health utility, whereas those electing continued medical management demonstrate stable health utility over 12 months.
38
European Position Paper on Rhinosinusitis and Nasal Polyps 2020
W.J. Fokkens, Valerie J. Lund, C. Hopkins et al. · Rhinology Journal · 2020 · 5.5K citations · Full text
Medicine, Otolaryngology, Surgery +16
V J Lund, I S Mackay · PubMed · 1993 · 1.5K citations
Clinical practice guideline: Adult sinusitis
Richard M. Rosenfeld, David R. Andes, Bhattacharyya Neil et al. · Otolaryngology · 2007 · 912 citations
Medicine, Otolaryngology, Rhinology +11
[European position paper on rhinosinusitis and nasal polyps group].
Wytske J. Fokkens, Valerie J. Lund, Joaquim Mullol · PubMed · 2008 · 529 citations
Medicine, Otolaryngology, Surgery +13