Reflecting on the development of interpretative phenomenological analysis and its contribution to qualitative research in psychology

Jonathan A. Smith

BIROn (Birkbeck, University of London) · 2008 · 2.2K citations · 25 references

Concepts

TL;DR

The paper reflects on the development of interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) as a qualitative approach in psychology. It aims to synthesize reflections on the future development of IPA. After briefly introducing IPA, the authors outline its idiographic, inductive, and interrogative features with examples, and discuss suitable topics, emerging patterns of work, participant inclusion, and data collection methods. They examine the various levels of interpretation possible with IPA and evaluate criteria for determining when an interpretation is sufficiently robust.

Abstract

This paper reflects on the development of interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) as one particular qualitative approach to psychology. After a brief introduction to IPA, the paper outlines what can be described as its characteristic features: idiographic, inductive, interrogative, illustrating each feature with examples from studies which have been conducted with IPA. The paper then considers the different levels of interpretation, which are possible with IPA and discusses the notion of when an interpretation is ‘good enough’. It goes on to consider issues around the types of topics for which IPA is suitable and the emerging pattern of work using the approach. The next section considers how IPA studies can widen the type of participants included and also examines the suitability of different data collection methods. The paper finishes by bringing together some thoughts on the future development of IPA.

References

25