[Effects of intracoronary or intravenous tirofiban administration in patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention].

Xinchun Yang, Dapeng Zhang, Lefeng Wang, Li Xu, Yonggui Ge, Hongshi Wang, Wei‐Ming Li, Zhu-hua Ni, Kun Xia, Yong Lian,

PubMed · 2007 · 25 citations · 0 references

Concepts

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects on MACE of intracoronary or intravenous tirofiban bolus administration in patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). METHODS: A total of 60 consecutive STEMI patients ready to receive primary PCI were randomly assigned to intracoronary tirofiban bolus (10 microg/kg) prior to the first balloon inflation (Group IC) or to intravenous tirofiban bolus at the same dose prior to coronary angiography (Group IV), followed by a 36-hours IV tirofiban (0.15 microg . kg(-1) . min(-1)) infusion for all patients. Clinical and angiographic features between 2 groups before and after PCI were analyzed. RESULTS: Fifty-four out of 60 STEMI patients accomplished the study. Group IC was superior to Group IV in terms of TIMI flow grade, TIMI myocardial perfusion grade, ST-segment resolution, the distal embolism of IRA immediately after PCI and ejection fraction at 5 - 7 days after the PCI. The in-hospital MACE rate and bleeding complications were similar between the groups while, the combined incidence of MACE during follow-up was significantly lower in the Group IC compared with Group IV (7.1% versus 30.8%; P = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Intracoronary bolus application of tirofiban is associated with superior clinical prognosis compared with the standard intravenous bolus application of tirofiban in patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI.