Journal of Microfinance / ESR Review · 2004 · 12 citations · 16 references
BusinessEconomicsFinanceCommunity DevelopmentCooperative EconomicsLocal FinanceCooperative FinanceCredit CooperativesMicrofinanceMicrofinance InstitutionsSavings AssociationsSavings InstitutionsCommunity-based LendingConcessionary FinancingCooperative FinancingCooperative LendingFinancial Performance ImpactMicrofinance CooperativesRegional Institution-buildingSavings Cooperatives
Savings and credit cooperatives (SCCs) provide a variety of micro-finance services to households in three of Nepal's distinct regions—the Hills, Terai, and Kathmandu Valley. Nearly all Nepali SCCs are self-funded using member savings and equity. Most Nepali SCCs are also profitable, including those located in poor, remote areas of the Hills region. Key reasons for the SCCs' strong financial performance include reliance on member savings and control of administration costs. High-profit SCCs also show superior interest earnings on loans compared to low-profit SCCs. Nepali SCCs do not need concessionary funds, because they are already profitable and able to mobilize member savings. While savings-led microfinance in Nepali SCCs is a slow process, there is significant long-term outreach potential in local communities. The government and donors should pursue institution-building strategies to strengthen Nepali SCCs and should not provide concessionary funding.
16
Jonathan Morduch · Journal of Economic Literature · 1999 · 2.2K citations
Social Sciences, Economics, Finance +14
Microcredit and the Poorest of the Poor: Theory and Evidence from Bolivia
Sergio Navajas, Mark Schreiner, Richard L. Meyer et al. · World Development · 2000 · 506 citations
Social Sciences, Economics, Finance +11
WHAT MAKES RURAL FINANCE INSTITUTIONS SUCCESSFUL?
Jacob Yaron · The World Bank Research Observer · 1994 · 282 citations
Agriculture, Economics, Finance +16