PubMed · 2003 · 12 citations · 6 references
MedicineOphthalmologySurgeryCost-effectiveness AnalysisOphthalmic SurgeryPharmacoeconomic ModelingCataract ManagementCataract SurgeryLens SurgeryPharmacoeconomic EvaluationDirect Cost AnalysisSingle-blind Trials
A randomised single blinded clinical trial to compare the cost of cataract surgery between extracapsular cataract extraction (ECCE) and phacoemulsification (PEA) was conducted at Hospital Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (HUKM) between March and December 2000. A total of 60 patients were included in this study. The cost of a cataract surgery incurred by hospital, patients and households up to two months after discharge were included. The costs of training, loss of patients' income after discharge and intangible costs were excluded. Results showed that the average cost for one ECCE operation is RM1,664.46 (RM1,233.04-RM2,377.64) and for PEA is RM1,978.00 (RM1,557.87-RM3,334.50). During this short period of follow up, it can be concluded that ECCE is significantly cheaper than PEA by an average difference of RM 313.54 per patient (p < 0.001). Cost of equipment and low frequency of PEA technique done in HUKM were the two main reasons for the high unit cost of PEA as compared to ECCE.
6
B Thylefors, A D Négrel, R Pararajasegaram et al. · PubMed · 1995 · 1.1K citations
Monitoring visual outcome of cataract surgery in India.
Hans Limburg, Allen Foster, Kannan Vaidyanathan et al. · PubMed · 1999 · 102 citations · Full text
Medicine, Ophthalmology, Surgery +17
Peter Asimakis, Douglas J. Coster, Deborah J. Lewis · Australian and New Zealand Journal of Ophthalmology · 1996 · 25 citations · Full text
Medicine, Ophthalmology, Surgery +10