Publication | Open Access
Laboratory Safety in Research with Infectious Aerosols
45
Citations
50
References
1964
Year
Laboratory SafetyInfectious Disease EpidemiologyRecognizable AccidentsPathogenic MicrobiologyIndoor AerosolAir Pollution FiltrationLaboratory DependMedicineExposure AssessmentToxicologyMicrobiologyInfection ControlAir PollutionDisinfectantUnited StatesClinical MicrobiologyEpidemiologyInhalation Toxicology
THE MEANS by which man becomes in¬ fected in the laboratory depend to a con¬ siderable extent upon his experimental proce¬ dures.But in the absence of procedures that especially predispose to aspiration, penetrating self-inoculation, or dermal contamination, the most common method of infection is the inhala- tion of accidentally formed microbial aerosol. How Accidental Infection OccursA 1950 survey of 1,342 laboratory-acquired infeetions in the United States revealed that recognizable accidents accounted for only 16 percent (1).The precipitating act, source, or means of infection was unknown in 80 to 84 per¬ cent of the cases.At Fort Detrick, exhaustive on-the-spot investigation of 90 laboratory ill¬ nesses occurring from 1953 to 1957 could reduce this unknown group to no less than 65 per¬ cent (2).Common manipulations with the inoculating needle, pipette, syringe, centrifuge, lyophilizer, and blendor create bacteria-laden aerosolized particles suitable for inhalation.Table 1 pro¬ vides illustrative data from a larger series of determinations concerning the number of such particles that may be recovered within 2 feet of the work area by air sampling (3, h).These numbers will be increased somewhat if arthrospores of Coccidioides immitis are used (5).
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1