Propositional Attitudes and Causation.

Konstantine Arkoudas, Selmer Bringsjord

International Journal of Software and Informatics · 2009 · 41 citations · 13 references

Concepts

TL;DR

Predicting and explaining others' behavior via mental states is indispensable for everyday life and will be equally important for artificial agents. The authors present an inference system for representing and reasoning about mental states and use it to formally analyze the false‑belief task. The system represents events, causation, and perceptual, doxastic, and epistemic states using event calculus and multi‑agent epistemic logic, focuses on mechanized proofs and proof programmability rather than metamathematical results, and performs reasoning with cognitively plausible inference rules, general‑purpose inference methods, and a syntactic embedding in first‑order logic.

Abstract

Predicting and explaining the behavior of others in terms of mental states is indispensable for everyday life. It will be equally important for artificial agents. We present an inference system for representing and reasoning about mental states, and use it to provide a formal analysis of the false-belief task. The system allows for the representation of information about events, causation, and perceptual, doxastic, and epistemic states (vision, belief, and knowledge), incorporating ideas from the event calculus and multi-agent epistemic logic. Unlike previous AI formalisms, our focus here is on mechanized proofs and proof programmability, not on metamathematical results. Reasoning is performed via relatively cognitively plausible inference rules, and a degree of automation is achieved by general-purpose inference methods and by a syntactic embedding of the system in first-order logic.

References

13