Publication Server of Goethe University Frankfurt am Main (Goethe University Frankfurt) · 2002 · 13 citations · 6 references
Open access
Language StudiesComputer ScienceComputational LinguisticsNatural Language ProcessingSyntaxDependency GrammarDependency ParsingParsingSentence ParsingSyntactic AnalysisSyntactic ParsingDependency Structure ModelingDependency Tree EvaluationParsing Accuracy MetricsPartial Parsing
Quantitative evaluation of parsers has traditionally centered around the PARSEVAL measures of crossing brackets, (labeled) precision, and (labeled) recall. However, it is well known that these measures do not give an accurate picture of the quality of the parsers output. Furthermore, we will show that they are especially unsuited for partial parsers. In recent years, research has concentrated on dependencybased evaluation measures. We will show in this paper that such a dependency-based evaluation scheme is particularly suitable for partial parsers. TüBa-D, the treebank used here for evaluation, contains all the necessary dependency information so that the conversion of trees into a dependency structure does not have to rely on heuristics. Therefore, the dependency representations are not only reliable, they are also linguistically motivated and can be used for linguistic purposes.
6
Procedure for quantitatively comparing the syntactic coverage of English grammars
Judith L. Klavans, Mark Liberman, Mitchell P. Marcus et al. · 1991 · 436 citations
Incremental finite-state parsing
Salah Aı̈t-Mokhtar, Jean-Pierre Chanod · 1997 · 118 citations · Full text
Automation of treebank annotation
Thorsten Brants, Wojciech Skut · 1998 · 34 citations · Full text