The American Surgeon · 2003 · 183 citations · 35 references
MedicineCardiologySurgeryCardiothoracic SurgeryInterventional CardiologyVascular SurgeryCardiac CatheterizationPulmonary EmbolismThromboembolism PreventionVascular Access SafetyVenous AccessVenous InterventionsIatrogenic Vascular InjuryInferior Vena Cava Filter PlacementInferior Vena Cava UltrasoundIntraoperative Vessel InjuryLong-term ComplicationsProcedure-related ComplicationsRecurrent Pulmonary EmbolismVascular Injury Prevention
Inferior vena cava (IVC) filters offer a safe and effective means of preventing pulmonary embolus and have reduced complications when compared to earlier techniques of caval interruption. However, despite continued improvement in filters and insertion methods, complications still occur. Pneumothorax, hemorrhage, and vessel injury may result while obtaining vascular access. Filter misplacement, excessive tilt, and vascular injury have been reported with insertion, but preinsertion cavography is helpful in preventing these insertion-related complications. Attention to detail, proper use of guidewires, and preinsertion imaging are vital in preventing insertion-related complications as well. Long-term complications occur in a minority of patients and include recurrent pulmonary embolus, caval occlusion, and filter migration. Overall, the benefits of preventing pulmonary embolism far exceed the risks related to filter placement in properly selected patients.
35
Percutaneous inferior vena caval filters: follow-up of seven designs in 320 patients.
Ernest J. Ferris, Timothy C. McCowan, Danna K. Carver et al. · Radiology · 1993 · 305 citations
Comparative efficacy and complications of vena caval filters
Chittur R. Mohan, Jamal J. Hoballah, William J. Sharp et al. · Journal of Vascular Surgery · 1995 · 111 citations · Full text