Y. Omori

Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: Cosmological constraints from galaxy clustering and weak lensing

T. M. C. Abbott, M. Aguena, A. Alarcon et al. · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · 2022 · 1K citations · Full text

Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: Cosmology from cosmic shear and robustness to modeling uncertainty

L. F. Secco, S. Samuroff, E. Krause et al. · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · 2022 · 350 citations · Full text

Measurements of the <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:math>-mode polarization and temperature-<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:math>-mode correlation of the CMB from SPT-3G 2018 data

D. Dutcher, L. Balkenhol, P. A. R. Ade et al. · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · 2021 · 252 citations · Full text

Superluminous supernovae at redshifts of 2.05 and 3.90

Jeff Cooke, M. Sullivan, A. Gal‐Yam et al. · Nature · 2012 · 166 citations · Full text

Relativistic Astrophysics, High-energy Astrophysics, Superluminous Supernovae

Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Multi-Probe Methodology and Simulated Likelihood Analyses

E. Krause, T. F. Eifler, J. Zuntz et al. · arXiv (Cornell University) · 2017 · 126 citations · Full text

Engineering, Astrostatistics, Inference Pipelines +16